Jim Dean![]() Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1059 Joined: 10/11/2012 Location: L'ville, GA ![]() | The PURPOSE of this thread was intended to focus on the NEED FOR minimum trade size settings, in SOME form or another that would allow users to FLEXIBLY define them. The request was NOT intended to "lock in" to the current architecture "versus" other proposed architectures ... it was intended to be GENERIC. So, if anyone OBJECTS to having some flexible form of minimum-size user-input controls, VERSUS HAVING NONE AT ALL, then your comments might be helpful here. Comments regarding architecture in general are likely to "cloud" the initial reason for posting this request. I suggest that those architectural comments be put in a different thread, since this suggestion is not contingent on what direction those other things might lead. That, at least, was my INTENT. |