Mark Holstius![]() Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 744 Joined: 10/11/2012 Location: Sleepy Hollow, IL ![]() | I’ve looked at something similar in the past and was intrigued by Jim’s idea of changing the “rules” for switching according to Market State - so I spent quite a bit of time the last few days designing a practical way to determine if it was feasible and worthwhile. While I strongly agree with Steve that Nirvana needs to concentrate first and foremost on getting the advanced tools we’ve discussed to market, the improvement from modifying one "decision" criterion was impressive. Steve & I are currently limited by the capabilities of Excel, but I wrote a new macro that again switches between 2 portfolios to test my theory. It chooses from a universe of 40 different selection "factors" (RSI, etc) based on their performance over the previous 6, 5, 4, or 3 month periods. The universe of factors doesn’t change, just the number of months used to select the best performing one over that X month period - and then that factor is used to choose the one portfolio of 2 to use the following month, rolling forward one month at a time for 7 years. In other words, the only variation in the 4 algorithm setups is the BT period. The results are quite different for the 4 periods. The image below has the dates on the left and columns to the right for the results for the 4 periods. If the chosen port was the best of the 2 for the following month, the cell is green - if not, red. I’ve computed the results for switching using the 4 BT periods, and they’re located at the bottom of each column. The equity ranges between $6.9M (64% of months correct) and $10.8M (71% of months correct). If we could determine at the EOM whether to use the 6, 5, 4, or 3 month BT choice, the results would be improved rather dramatically. ($15.4M and 82.6% correct) Over this 7 year period (1/1/07 to 1/1/14), there was only a need for 6 changes from one BT period to the other - and during many periods there was considerable agreement and overlap between the results for the 4 different BT periods, so the “Market State” rule would not have to be too sensitive or stringent. In only a couple of cases is the move an “abrupt” one; #1 - any time during a 4 month period #2 - any time during a 9 month period #3 - any time during a 3 month period #4 - any time during an 8 month period #5 - any time during a 7 month period #6 - any time during a 2 month period The results for simply changing the BT period those 6 times are in the column to the right: $15.4M and 82.6% of months the correct portfolio is chosen. Note: these are true "walk forward" results (not curve fit over past data) and Ed's excellent ARM4 yields $4M over the same period. Jim - you’ve done a lot of work to quantify “Market State” identification, so I wonder if this might be possible? Mark [Edited by Mark Holstius on 4/13/2014 7:28 PM] ![]() |