OmniVest Forum OmniVest Forum
Main
forums calendars search
Threads
today this week
Jump To Forum
 
Account
register logon control panel Forum Rules
You are currently browsing as a guest.
You should logon to access more features
A Self-Moderated Community - ALL MEMBERS, PLEASE READ!
Vote for Members who contribute the most to your trading, and help us moderate content within the Forums.

[Random Quote] -

Only Forum Moderators, Administrators, and the owner of this message may delete it.

 
Geoff

Veteran
100252525
Posts: 180

Joined: 12/4/2012
Location: Byron Bay NSW Australia

User Profile 
Subject : RE: Dynamic Portfolios should be self-contained
Posted : 9/7/2014 6:36 AM
Post #33965 - In reply to #33955
Originally written by kmcintyre on 9/7/2014 9:27 AM

At least that's the way I would design and implement it.

(Object oriented. Low coupling.)


Thanks for documenting your observations/thoughts so thoroughly Keith. I agree with you, logically, keeping a degree of separation between the 'objects' - DPs, Ports and Accounts, seems to make sense.

I agree with your point #1 that DPs should be self-contained with their own settings as, I think, all Ports should have their own settings attached. Fundamentally, the only connection that should exist between the 'Account' and its DPs is the list of active Strats that have been generated by the DP for the current period.
Deleting message 33965 : RE: Dynamic Portfolios should be self-contained


Nirvana Systems
For any problems or issues please contact our Webmaster at webmaster@nirvsys.com.