OmniTrader Forum OmniTrader Forum
forums calendars search
today this week
 
register logon control panel Forum Rules
You are currently browsing as a guest.
You should logon to access more features
A Self-Moderated Community - ALL MEMBERS, PLEASE READ!
Vote for Members who contribute the most to your trading, and help us moderate content within the Forums.


Only Forum Moderators, Administrators, and the owner of this message may delete it.

 
Jim Dean

Sage
20001000
Posts: 3022

Joined: 9/21/2006
Location: L'ville, GA

User Profile
 
Subject : RE: Two "Exponential" Moving Average Crossover
Posted : 7/11/2010 1:34 PM
Post #21078 - In reply to #21077

Reality check, guys. Forget about the term "reversing" - think of it as an input field that permits all possible signals to get through. We could just as well have used N=1. I suggested Rev over N=1 so that later if we want to do some param optimization, the NPP would be an avail field.

We are not yet really trying to improve the strategy, but rather are seeking to investigate alternative means of modeling the same thing. It's a discovery process. I think that using the simple model rev2in1 for now is the best for moving ahead. We have very usefully identified several means of using the tools - that's why I'm here. Ready to move on?
Deleting message 21078 : RE: Two "Exponential" Moving Average Crossover


Nirvana Systems
For any problems or issues please contact our Webmaster at webmaster@nirvsys.com.