Jim Dean![]() Sage ![]() ![]() Posts: 3022 Joined: 9/21/2006 Location: L'ville, GA ![]() | Reality check, guys. Forget about the term "reversing" - think of it as an input field that permits all possible signals to get through. We could just as well have used N=1. I suggested Rev over N=1 so that later if we want to do some param optimization, the NPP would be an avail field. We are not yet really trying to improve the strategy, but rather are seeking to investigate alternative means of modeling the same thing. It's a discovery process. I think that using the simple model rev2in1 for now is the best for moving ahead. We have very usefully identified several means of using the tools - that's why I'm here. Ready to move on? |