OmniTrader Forum OmniTrader Forum
forums calendars search
today this week
 
register logon control panel Forum Rules
You are currently browsing as a guest.
You should logon to access more features
A Self-Moderated Community - ALL MEMBERS, PLEASE READ!
Vote for Members who contribute the most to your trading, and help us moderate content within the Forums.


Only Forum Moderators, Administrators, and the owner of this message may delete it.

 
Jim Dean

Sage
20001000
Posts: 3022

Joined: 9/21/2006
Location: L'ville, GA

User Profile
 
Subject : RE: Two "Exponential" Moving Average Crossover
Posted : 7/14/2010 12:00 AM
Post #21138 - In reply to #21137

OK ... I'm going to presume you will do the counting exercize ... you should be providing SIX numbers per the requests of the last post ... this will simply duplicate the work I've also done ;~)

I've tried to emphasize the importance of LOOKING AT THE CHARTS. Do simple counting exercises. Look at them from the right, left, top, bottom, green vs red, and so forth.

ONCE that is done, and you've obtained a visual-feel for things, THEN it can be useful, especially in cases like this one where there is no clear answer (between Slow and Fast versions) immediately obvious ... to look at the BackTest reports.

Simple instructions:
1. Don't use PortSim for this ... its extra features don't apply yet
2. Set a fixed backtest period that matches your eyeball reviews
3. Use the same Focus List as your eyeball reviews
4. Test one strategy at a time and save the Results (delete fwd test info)
5. Compare simple stat's first, then drill deeper

The three snapshots below are the Summary Performance+Detail Reports for each of the three Reversal systems that you last checked ... which clearly had enough trades in the 12mo period to be meaningful statistically for simple conclusions.

These reports can seem overwhelming due to their very "busy" nature ... it's a useful format, but you have to sort of "dissect" it the first couple of times you look at it so that you don't get cross-eyed.

So, first off ... I set up the backtest period (using ToDo > Test Settings) to be a FIXED period of 7/1/09 through 7/13/10 ... the same as my eyeball. The fwd test, for these purposes, is not necessary since we are not optimizing or tweaking anything.

This allowed me to CHOP OFF the RIGHT HALF of each of the two reports ... simplifying them. Ahhhhhhh! :~)

Then, I highlighted the THREE MOST USEFUL NUMBERS (imho) in purple, blue and green. NOTICE how those numbers are REPEATED, over and over, in each pair of reports. Finally, I highlighted three more rows of numbers on the Detail report (in red) that I consider reasonably valuable at this stage in the game.

Most of the other non-highlighted numbers, FOR THESE PURPOSES, are either redundant or effectively meaningless (for a variety of reasons). They all do have merit in other circumstances, however.

So ... spend some time with these reports. COMPARE THE NUMBERS - just the highlighted ones. Look back at the statistics you compiled regarding how the two Filt strats "matched up" with the DDE strat.

NOW ... can you draw any useful conclusions?












[Edited by Jim Dean on 7/14/2010 12:08 AM]

Attached file : DualEMArev-2in1 DJ30,12mo.png (226KB - 934 downloads)
Attached file : DualEMArev-FiltFast DJ30,12mo.png (227KB - 831 downloads)
Attached file : DualEMArev-FiltSlow DJ30,12mo.png (224KB - 917 downloads)

Deleting message 21138 : RE: Two "Exponential" Moving Average Crossover


Nirvana Systems
For any problems or issues please contact our Webmaster at webmaster@nirvsys.com.