OmniTrader Forum OmniTrader Forum
forums calendars search
today this week
 
register logon control panel Forum Rules
You are currently browsing as a guest.
You should logon to access more features
A Self-Moderated Community - ALL MEMBERS, PLEASE READ!
Vote for Members who contribute the most to your trading, and help us moderate content within the Forums.


Only Forum Moderators, Administrators, and the owner of this message may delete it.

 
Vinay

Elite
50010025
Posts: 640

Joined: 12/9/2011
Location: Planet Earth

User Profile
 
Subject : RE: Fulcrum Block Strange Behaviour
Posted : 1/15/2014 4:34 AM
Post #30608 - In reply to #30607

Originally written by Ryan Olson on 1/15/2014 4:06 AM

The problem is the perception of how the fulcrum should be working.

On 9/19/2013 when the VTY-B-D fired the signal it would have initiated the the fulcrum. However, it will not base the levels calculation on the signal bar, but rather the close of the following bar.


Ryan, why should Fulcrums base the levels calculations on close of the following bar and not on the signal bar?


Which would generate the signal as the vote line specified. Now if you were to use the same settings and allow it to use the close of the current bar as entry (which it can't) then your assumption is correct and should have entered the next bar like you have suggested in your post.


Even if the levels are based on close of the following bar, why the Fulcrum Block generates the trade when prices have fallen instead of going up by 0.5 ATR as configured in my Fulcrum Block? As you can see that my strategy fired a long signal and the Fulcrum should have taken long position only if the prices went 0.5 ATR above the close. In the present case since price have fallen, logically it should not have taken any trade at all.





[Edited by Vinay on 1/15/2014 11:31 AM]

Deleting message 30608 : RE: Fulcrum Block Strange Behaviour


Nirvana Systems
For any problems or issues please contact our Webmaster at webmaster@nirvsys.com.