jpb![]() Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 168 Joined: 5/11/2005 Location: Brown Deer, WI ![]() | I got thinking that with RTM strategies, we are really looking at a short time horizon. I wondered if there was an optimal time horizon per strategy that if the position didn't move, we should close the trade. To achieve this, I added an Inactivity condition to each trade plan and used the Strategy Wizard to step through each strategy, testing each Inactivity period from 2 to 22 step 2. From there I tested the period before and after the period that had the highest ratio for Avg Ann ROI/Profit Standard Deviation. I use this ratio because for me it is an assessment of the distribution -- the tighter the Std, the more predictable it is and the less inherent risk. Next, as I was catching up on my forum reading, I saw that Steve Luerman had done some nice work by changing the strategies to use Market on Close for entry/exit and used the Reuse Intraday funds. I also believe he used the Simulation Setting to Increase Trade Size vs Increase Number of Trades. Combining the 2 concepts of Inactivity and MOC, I came up with the following results: Note that these results include commissions. Of interest, if you don't reuse the Intraday Funds, the ranking of the methods: 1) Inactivity + MOC 2) Inactivity 3) MOC 4) Base (my interpretation of Mark H's original Macro + Micro posting) 5) ATM Macro & Micro from the Nirvana distribution Activating the reuse of Intraday Funds flip flops the #2 and #3. The results were also lower, but this shows that combining the ideas is adative. At 1.23x leverage and no commissions, the Inactivity + MOC method produces: Avg Ann ROI / Avg Ann MDD = 85.0% / 12.4% = 6.85 For those interested in the Periods of Inactivity used in each strategy: CRT-3: 2 NSP-41: 9 RTM7a: 4 T3-S3: 4 XLS-19 V2: 4 X-MFI: 7 X-ULT: 9 Finally, one more pic. For those of you that wonder what an account would look like that starts with $10,000 over the 15 year period, with commissions and no intraday reuse of funds... Large images attached for those wanting higher resolution. [Edited by jpb on 4/16/2018 8:05 PM] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |