Jim Dean Sage   Posts: 3022 Joined: 9/21/2006 Location: L'ville, GA  User Profile | I hope you are right, Keith. I’ve been in communication with Steve at N, explaining the need for support of MG groups and Symbol by Symbol formulae for the MS formula. He said that there was no resistance to the idea but they could not get it done before the Bash. That’s different than what Mark is describing (an overlap of MS's) … "overlap" does *not* imply that a formula for MS which currently doesn’t work if getclose($Group) or getclose(Symbol) is used in it, *will* be acceptable. But I certainly hope it will be. My viewpoint on MS analysis is that the tiered formula capability is crucial, since no one index Symbol is a good avatar for a big FL of trade-Symbols [Edited by Jim Dean on 5/2/2018 9:44 AM] | |
