OmniTrader Forum OmniTrader Forum
forums calendars search
today this week
 
register logon control panel Forum Rules
You are currently browsing as a guest.
You should logon to access more features
A Self-Moderated Community - ALL MEMBERS, PLEASE READ!
Vote for Members who contribute the most to your trading, and help us moderate content within the Forums.


This message cannot be deleted. It is the first message of the thread.
Administrators or moderators may choose to delete the entire thread


 
Jim Dean

Sage
20001000
Posts: 3022

Joined: 9/21/2006
Location: L'ville, GA

User Profile
 
Subject : Concurrent Market States questions
Posted : 6/27/2018 8:01 PM
Post #44887

Just watched Jeff’s seminar. Very well done. This appears to be an excellent step forward.

My primary question is about how to “balance” the selections from the various enabled market state groups. I suspect that the Sequential method is the best vehicle for that.

Jeff clearly explained how it rotates thru each Group and works from the top down, peeling off symbols from each group until it runs out of money.

Here is a scenario based on that, presuming three groups each with four states as per his slide. Let’s assume that each state has its own internal filtering - maybe associated with the rankings, maybe something else - so that the following number of symbols pass the test on a given bar:
Group 1: 3 symbols avail a b c
Group 2: 1 symbol avail d
Group 3: 9 symbols avail e f g h i j k l m

The process will select, presuming funds are available, a d e b … then (presumably) f c g. After that, if funds are still avail, I presume it selects h i j k l m.

Ok - if that’s not correct then please tell me how it does work for that example.

That’s the scenario. Now the QUESTIONS:

1. How can I get it to automatically stop when it hits a pass that there are not symbols available in all three groups (or maybe in at least two of the three?

2. How can I get it to keep track of the Capital &/or Risk in each of the positions, so that it keeps on going with more symbols so optimize a rough balance of funds committed to each group (or to risk taken)?

Obviously 2 is tougher than 1 - but it would be wonderful if possible.

Deleting message 44887 : Concurrent Market States questions


Nirvana Systems
For any problems or issues please contact our Webmaster at webmaster@nirvsys.com.